Category Archives: Publishing

Digital Supplement from ALA

ALA Digital Supplement – Check out the document to read more on eBooks in libraries, statistics, info and more… Good read, it’s a start for understanding challenges and seeing where things are at…

E-books, U.S. Public Libraries 2012 | American Library Association

E-books, U.S. Public Libraries 2012 | American Library Association.


Demand for better eBook Services

So over at the Digital Shift you can read the full article, I won’t bother to go through the whole thing. I think the whole idea is and will be a failure causing nothing more than larger rifts and a greater escalation of animosity between pubs and libs. Argue against if you want, but trust me, anyone who says they are both playing nice and really striving hasn’t heard of the cat and mouse approach to things.

What I want to do is look at the 4 demands the libraries are making, because some of them are just plain wonky, I’ll explain why.


1. Search and browse a single comprehensive catalog with all of a library’s offerings at once, including all e-books, physical collections, programs, blogs, and donor opportunities. Currently, content providers often only allow searches within the products they sell, depriving users of the comprehensive library experience.

  • To be honest a large chunk of this is the libraries responsibilities, not the pubs. If you own content in your library, your search portal should handle the searching across your collections and content you own, not the pub. If the pub wants to provide an api to allow for access into their catalog to find more content, great, but can your lib system handle it? Have you heard of patron drive acquisition, this same thing is accomplished somewhat with that. A large dump of records, users don’t know if you own them or not, but they are discoverable. Seems to be a mix of what a library is suppose to do and what a publisher does and what a vendor of services does.
 2. Place holds, check-out items, view availability, manage fines and receive communications within individual library catalogs or in the venue the library believes will serve them best, without having to visit separate websites (libraries, not distributors, should be enabled to manage all interactions with users).
  • This makes no sense in some respects this demands list is going back and forth with pubs and distributors. Some of these services are provided by ILS systems, some by distributors, but not all by one. There is a reason vendors of products focus on specific offerings and services, it’s what they do best and why get involved in everything, not a good business plan. 
 3. Seamlessly enjoy a variety of e-content. To do this, libraries must be able to choose content, devices and apps from any provider or from multiple providers, without bundling that limits a library’s ability to serve content they purchase on platforms of their choice.
  • This is more of a making sure the content is in either epub or mobi for kindles. Plus it brings up a whole issue of what is an eBook? Is it the pdf documents, is it website content that isn’t a database. You need to define these before you can say support this, we need it when you don’t really know what you need or want. PDF is horrible on small devices, so then does the vendor need to offer it in epub or mobi as well, if so, how does that figure into cost and backend systems and do they want to support a format not ideal for smaller mobile devices. Saying we want this is great, but does it make sense?
 4. Download e-books that are compatible with all readers, from the Kindle to the Nook to the iPad and so on.
  • This is really wonky and makes me think whomever wrote it didn’t bother to really think about it. If the eBook is in epub, it works on all readers, just to varying degrees depending on the device, app, etc. Kindle mobi files can be read on the ipad in the kindle app,plus kindle isn’t only the device but the platform, so a parameter needs to be set by what is meant. Therefore with the iPad alone, you would be covered for reading any formats. For the nook or fire to support different formats, well that’s the device manufacturers discretion, not something the pub forces or has a hand in. Plus all readers, seriously, know how many apps and devices that are out there, a pub nor vendor of eBooks will be able to supply a file that looks and acts exactly the same on each device, too much crap out there. 
The biggest problem I have with the overall demands aspect is that it is a gimme gimme gimme and no matter what side you fall on, we all know that it means failure. I’ve said it before, will say it again, both pub and libraries and vendors need to talk about what really matters and give up some and take some, no 100% satisfaction will bubble up, just not possible.
The other part of this is something I have thought about and come back to, the “we need to do x like we did with print.” To fully achieve eBooks in libraries, here’s what needs to be done, scrap every thought and model you have, especially for trade, academic and research is actually pretty good, then start over… Yep, DUMP IT ALL. The reason for this is simple, eBooks are not print, print titles are not eBooks, eBooks should, can and will be more then print. So the minute I hear eBooks are great, but with print…. I stop listening, Why? Because it doesn’t matter. Print is print and eBooks are eBooks, they are not the same and when we stop trying to stick things from print in eBooks we’ll be better off. Content wise, yes, let’s add or enhance in eBooks, Inter-library loans were meant for print, not eBooks, let it go. I don’t care the argument, they served a purpose in the print world and still do, but for eBooks, they make no sense.
Libraries want eBooks in the most widely used or offered format and that works well so they don’t have to deal with complaints or tech issues, makes sense, then demand that ePub and mobi are used for the eBook format, not pdf. How do you change this with pubs, stop buying the content. Realize that whatever you do, is for the patrons, not because of some cause or petition or something else, you are using taxpayer money for a lot of this, no matter how you slice it, somewhere, somehow tax money pays for it all, unless you have a wealthy benefactor. What this means is that boycotting because of usage, isn’t the answer. Yes, I said to not buy if not in the format, because that limits accessibility, etc. The usage models are something that need to be scrapped, we all know that, but at least people are trying with them.
There are vendors that will promise you the world, especially with trade titles, ed titles etc. Many of them don’t have a clue, they are simply a sell through for the pubs content and have no idea, there readers are skinned adobe digital editions and most don’t understand what an eBook is, does, how it is created or how it is used. I’ve worked with libraries for about 15 years, maybe longer in a variety of ways. Collection development, acquisitions, workflows, explaining what an eBook is when they hit in libraries and people started working with them. I can tell you that there are just as many pubs and distributors and vendors that have no clue as their are librarians. It’s not a slam, not by any chance, what it is is a reflection of poor information, or jumping on a bandwagon. ALA is no embraced with knowledge on eBooks then some of the average people on the street. Having worked with a variety of the vendors out there and many larger universities, public libraries, k12 systems, curriculum people, I can honestly say that many are still feeling around. It’s not a bad thing, admitting you don’t know is fine, better then just following the crowd when it doesn’t make sense.
These demands though, stating they must be followed to achieve such and such is ridiculous. If they do happen, it’ll only be to appease libraries for a short time while the next change in the eBook world takes place and we’ll be back to square one. I said this once before, to achieve anything of eBooks and libraries, they both need to come to the table, not ALA, but other librarians and people that actually know what they are talking about and bring your list of wants. Don’t call them must haves, or needs or any of that junk, say this is what we want, how do we get there? Then the pub has their same list of wants and then you both knock 50% off your lists and realize from that 50% remaining on each list, you’ll probably only get 50% of that, so 25% from each side…. It’s better then nothing and achieves more then ultimatums and demands…

Repost: The Business Rusch: Royalty Statement Update 2012 – The Digital Reader

Lots of buzz on this, even had the blog of the original author get hacked, so wanted to make sure and share.. Even if you disagree or agree, it’s a good read.


Repost: The Business Rusch: Royalty Statement Update 2012 – The Digital Reader.

Grab your ankles….

Ok, so we all have heard of the settlement between Hachette, S&S, & HarperCollins have settled with the DOJ, read here. Now many people don’t understand the agency model, the “most favored nation” part that has been brought up or other parts of the eBook business. It hasn’t stopped many from jumping on the DOJ to say way to go, vs the #dojfail twitter tag that people have started to express how bad the department of justice just screwed everybody.

Here’s a down and dirty on the models for eBooks, before agency and after.

  • Old model: retailers set the prices you pay (think of amazon saying we’ll buy your eBook from you, at a discount and then set the price we want to sell and screw you however we please)
  • New model: publishers set the prices you pay (amazon still takes or apple takes a 30% cut, not exactly sure what amzn is complaining about, they still have millions)

I know very simple, more to it, but to be honest, that’s the easy way to describe it. Now people call the agency model price fixing, or that publishers and Apple colluded on the prices, colluded meaning – a secret agreement, especially for fraudulent or treacherous purposes; conspiracy: (one definition of it). Problem here is that no collusion was done, it wasn’t a secret, everyone knew about it. So going after everyone like the DOJ based on that, they were wrong from the start. Now the price fixing comments, take a look here, I’ll wait for you to come back. Ok, now what Nate talks about over there and references what Mark from Smashwords, who I barely agree with on anything, is about how airlines prices were fixed. The interesting thing was that if the govt kept prices low, affordable and people were buying like crazy for airlines, why wasn’t that bad? I disagree with Nate on one thought and that is that I do think the companies should be competing on service and if possible, sure price. I’m unique though, I rarely shop amazon, maybe 5 times since the site was up, I don’t buy eBooks there either, I’m not alone, as we know they hold 60% of the marketshare, so 40% are buying from somewhere else. Let’s not get into the other parts of eBook market where amazon is doing nothing; education, comics, etc., that would just make to much sense to talk reality.

Back to the point though, is that if you have to lower your prices and sell at a loss, it is usually because you don’t have the service abilities, the better quality. It’s like saying K-mart rocks because they are cheap; sure and crappy and full of junk. For me and many others I know, they want quality, they want service, I’m willing to pay a higher price for a higher quality and service level, something I have never seen from amazon. It’s like buying made in America vs china, sure it might be cheaper, but in reality it’s usually lower quality, falls apart or some lead paint warning comes down the line. The point is that publishers saying we want the Agency model to price eBooks means that it’s their content, they want to price it. When I was in retail, it was common knowledge that retailers would buy up print titles at steep discounts from the pubs, then price however we wanted, then in 6 months return the print books for money back. Yeah, sounds like a great business plan, anyone seen a waldenbooks or borders around, oh yeah, they failed. Now this wasn’t the cause of the failure, but running a business like that, just dumb all around, it affects everyone and to be honest, many times our books were full price when we got a 55% discount, the books still didn’t sell. Where was the DOJ to look into that realizing customers were getting screwed.

For those that think this is good news, you will be sadly mistaken, because if it holds, which I don’t think it will, Amazon will screw you in the end. Prices will go up, for all you independent authors, do you think amazon will care? They won’t amazon is in this for money, they are no more a champion of books then walmart is a champion of well, anything.  What will happen is Apple, Penguin and Macmillan will fight, they will probably win and the other 3 will be happy to jump back on things. Because if it does move forward, more then likely amazon will form a monopoly on things, then you’ll have a lawsuit against them and I hope, if people are smart, a lawsuit against the DOJ for being the idiots who screwed this up.

Even the ABA is baffled by the decision and not sure why the DOJ is in bed with amazon, or basically what kind of back-alley handshake occurred, because it seems as though amazon wrote the settlement details for the DOJ, funny how that works to their benefit. You then have states trying to cash in on the settlement, which after reading that i had to laugh, millions of dollars to be returned to customers. Um, how did you get the number? Exactly what was overpriced, that $.99 eBook was too much, simple DON’T BUY IT. I hate when people whine about how expensive something is, like gas; yet they are the idiot driving down the road in a hummer h2 doing 85 or 90. Drive intelligently, buy intelligently, if you don’t like the price, don’t buy it. Nobody forces anyone to buy anything, last I looked, we all had free will.

The sad thing is in the end, the ones who will actually be hurt by this is the consumer, nothing was actually done to help them. Amazon has had the most favored nation clause in place well before Apple, yet DOJ didn’t say anything about that or the monopolistic stranglehold that amazon has had. Now I’m not just singling out Amazon, no more so then the DOJ did with the publishers and Apple. However, if you are going to say this is an issue and go after some, you can’t leave someone else out of the party you started because you like them.

One final thought on this, is that why eBooks? Is everything else the DOJ has to worry about less important? Maybe the true focus should be on the quality and business practices. People will buy what they like from whom they like, keeping the price the same does one thing, forces a company to step up quality in service and what they offer. If they don’t they go down, look at Sony and eBooks, who buys from them, hardly anyone, if any, why, they missed the boat, quality of devices went down, offering of titles is poor and just an overall bad experience with them. Let us the consumers decide what we want, I don’t need the DOJ telling me this or that, if I don’t like the price, I don’t buy it, plain and simple, or look for something else. Check out Laura Dawson’s blog for some great thoughts on this as well.  Now let the comments and I have a feeling the rants begin.

Library Report on E-Book Lending: Publishers and Libraries Don’t Understand Each Other | Digital Book World

Library Report on E-Book Lending: Publishers and Libraries Don’t Understand Each Other | Digital Book World.


The discussion between libraries and publishers about eBooks is one that will always be ongoing. Now we all know that the disconnect has been there for some time, not surprising, at least if you have been paying attention for the last decade or more. This isn’t a blame game, it’s no one entities fault, it’s actually everyones fault. Nobody wanted to admit it, at least not in the open. They kept pushing policies, trying things out, complaining about each other, but nobody has really said, “Hey, we don’t have a clue.” Now this isn’t one sided, this is all sides.

Having worked with libraries all over the U.S., on all levels, all types for well over a decade, I can honestly say this isn’t a surprise the disconnect exists. I’m also not siding on anyones side… not because I don’t surport anyone, but because in all honesty, it’s both sides fault. Now neither will admit that, neither will step up and say, “Yes, we know were disconnected from the reality that exists, how do we fix it?” That day happens, someone call me, I’ll buy a round for the first one to do so at a conference some time. The problem is easy, everyone finds it easier to complain or pass the blame around. Nobody wants to say they screwed up or give in, that sign of weakness thing. They’d rather take their ball home and not play with anyone.

I’ve said this for quite a few years, in order for libraries and publishers to get on the same page for eBooks and other areas, they need to remove themselves from the equation. Neither can be agnostic about the view, they don’t want to budge and they have the wrong people having the conversation. CEOs or others at pubs and head of ALA aren’t in the trenches every day, not a slam, just a point of fact. When I started selling eBooks to libraries many asked the same question, how do I use this with my kindle? Know why they asked that, that’s all they knew, kindle, amazon, it was ridiculous, who wants to read a textbook on a kindle e-ink? You know who, NOBODY, zero, zilch, nada, not a single student. That’s not me saying it, it was every librarian who asked me that question who I went back to and discussed it with afterwards.

What many people don’t think about is that a one size fits all approach to eBooks for libraries doesn’t exist, can’t exist. Simple reason being that we have such a variety of library types, that a single model shouldn’t exist. Also, were dealing with multitudes of content; fiction, research, articles, reference, study aides, the list goes on. You cannot say this will work for all, when you think this way you ultimately lose sight of the purpose of the library and the patrons using it, no matter the type of library you are.

Sure we know part of the issue is license or access to the content. We also have DRM,restricting usage. Some of the fears I can understand, I said understand, not that I support them. Pubs are worried libraries will take a digital copy and just let it go like wildfire. Rightfully so, I know many that would do that. Libraries think that they should only have to buy 1 of the digital copy, which is extremely odd to me, when multiple copies of a print edition is bought, why not with digital? Even if you pay more, but get unlimited access and say buy 50 copies of the eBook that is still cheaper then 50 print, why no do it? I think it’s because we have become a society where we want it cheap and we want it fast, easy and no strings attached, which is wrong. Sure some eBooks are cheaper to produce, some aren’t and their still is a return on investment that pubs want with digital. It comes quicker, but it’s still there, think of enhanced eBooks.
Possible Outcomes
What I see happening is that some eBooks may not be available as eBooks themselves. Publishers may pull them back and create an app for an entity of titles, maybe by the same author or content that is the same. They do that, you’ll be buying apps instead.

Or the boycotts continue, which lets admit is a knee jerk reaction and one that won’t really solve anything. Not to mention, you have now taken content from your users, the same users that pay the taxes for you to buy the content. They are not being served, they have now lost access. Pubs need to pay attention to this and get things back on track, but everything is pretty much going to get ugly, just wait for ALA, it’ll be an interesting conference this year.

In the end what’s going to help, honest conversations, none of this we want and they want. It needs to be here’s a list from both of needs, wants, etc. Then be prepared to scrap about 50% of it and give in on that much, because there is no way that one is going to walk away with the larger percentage of their list intact, just can’t happen.


So after missing last year’s DBW (Digital Book World) I was able to attend this years. I didn’t make it to all the sessions, ended up in a lot of meetings and connecting with people from twitter, linkedin and other places that I have had conversations about publishing. Overall it was great, I was able to meet many in the publishing industry I either talk with on a regular basis via social media or follow via their blog, websites, tweets or some other way.  I was really impressed by the attitude of those there, it was energetic, fast paced and people were quite positive in regards to the state of publishing and it’s future. I think this is great, it’s exactly what is needed, passionate people involved in what they love.

Obviously not everything is rainbows and sunshine in the industry nor was it at the conference. It wasn’t the conference itself I had issues with it was the texas two steps some of these heads of publishing did around questions. Specifically about eBooks and libraries, the messages were great spins on basically them saying we have no clue but we aren’t going to ask you or anyone with knowledge about how to implement it in the best way.  Now I understand, you are the head of a publisher, your expected to know everything, but you know what, you don’t and you never will. You need to realize that there are people smarter then you out there that know what they are talking about. You want to work with eBooks and libraries? You want to understand how best to get your content in front of those eyes at public libraries, k12 schools and the list goes on? Simple, hire me… No seriously, get a hold of me and I help you implement, my fees are reasonable. 🙂 Now normally I don’t pimp myself out this way but I’ve sat and watched, listened and commented many times on eBooks and libraries, I even have a group on linkedin – eBooks in Libraries devoted to digital and libraries. Why, because I still believe they hold a place in the digital world and I’ve seen what many libraries throughout the U.S. spend on eBooks, it’s crazy. You know why, because patrons want them.  I understand it’s about profit, ROI, where to take a chance, all of that, but pushing it further and further out will only do one thing.. backfire on you and lose sales, no ROI and the list goes on.

Now that I got that out of my system, I feel much better. I’m a passionate person by nature and even more so when it comes to literature, publishing, eBooks and education.  I’ve worked with all of these areas well over a 15 years, which is saying something since I consider myself still pretty you, mid 30’s. I met many other people passionate at DBW, I mean, why not, that’s the point of the conference in my opinion, bringing together passionate people that want to change the course of the industry. Lead it, develop it and being on the edge of thinking within the industry… that excites the hell out of me honestly. The people I met, such as Guy LeCharles Gonzalez, Laura Dawson (although only briefly, my fault), Scott Walker, Babette Ross, Dan Wallek (lerner publishing), Liza Daly, Susan Neuhaus, Tina Henderson, Joshua Tallent, Colleen Cunningham, Andy Weissberg and the list goes on. These are people who want to understand better, form relationships and most of all, they want to do it right. They don’t cut corners and they are some of the most passionate people who are vocal about things. They get involved and they help others, which isn’t something you see in many industries, usually everyone is trying to take everyone else down, I think were all above that and realize that we can’t do it alone and we need each other, helps drive us all to do better and innovate.

Now this list isn’t extensive, I could go on and on and there are so many more I would have loved to connect with, need a day just for that. At the end though I was more excited and felt like I wasn’t the only one out there with these crazy ideas that publishing will still survive and that it isn’t dead.. some parts maybe, but I believe those needed to be changed years ago and were just now admitting it. 2011 is a year that I think will really reflect and affect the publishing industry like no other, because people aren’t sitting back and letting publishing decide the course, were pushing the course and guiding the industry and in some respects that hasn’t been done in many many years. There are innovators out there that are not happy with the status quo, I’m one of them, I don’t like stagnant and I don’t like no or having things put in a box, it shouldn’t be done any more in publishing. You need to be diverse, flexible and a hell of a risk taker; think that’s why I started another company and have a business partner and looking to challenge what is perceived as the way to do things. I think that is why many people have done the same way, they aren’t seeing it done some where else and figure if it needs to be done, then we do it ourselves. We build the stage and become our own starts so to speak,  write our own stories, be our characters…. have I thrown in enough cliches yet for your liking?

In the end publishing will still be here, being led by the innovators and those out of the box thinkers some call crazy, I call them my colleagues and some friends. Who wants to go rock publishing’s world?



Why publishing will march on…

Publishing is a business like any other, it has its ups and downs, sometimes more so than others. However, I wholeheartedly believe that it will succeed and not only succeed but I see a change coming in the very near future. Now this isn’t merely a post to appease to publishers, far from it… they’ve done some stupid things in the past and probably will again, that’s the way things work.  Yet, I can’t help but be optimistic about its future and what is coming.  For a little background I’ve been in publishing in a variety of roles, majority of it sales, for almost 15 years now both in the retail area and in the education market working with every library imaginable.  I’ve seen a lot, both good and bad, but who doesn’t in any industry?

The reasons I see publishing succeeding is that we have a variety of passionate people out there that are trying to make a change whether the publishers want it or not. That’s awesome, we need those people, I’d lump myself into that category… although I don’t have a lot of pull, I’m still passionate about it, because of what publishing means, can mean and why we need it, to keep stories, history, knowledge around. I like the internet as much as anyone else, but we all have to admit, the info is only as good as the source and a lot of times, it’s pretty crappy.  When I said there are passionate and vocal people out there in publishing, I’m not kidding.  In fact, here’s a list, now it’s not extensive and if you feel I left someone out, tell me and I’ll add them… I didn’t compile a list simply for the fact that it could be a post within itself. The industry needs to see who is busting their ass to save it and keep it going and make sure that it changes directions when it needs to.  The biggest fail that any publisher can do is to not hire passionate people who love books, the printed word, the digital word and those that think so far out of the box it scares the hell out of you.  Publishers need to do this, they need to find these people, hire them, pay them well.. this is key, you get what you pay for, pay lower and those with the high talent either won’t want to work with you or will not be as great at their job as they could be.  What’s the problem with that, pay someone well and show them you believe in their worth and what they do, its common sense really.

I’d love to do a list of everyone but it might be easier to say follow the people who are on twitter #DBW hastag, or #ePrdctn or #ISBNhour.  Follow these conversations and many more like them and you’ll see who they are that have a passion for the publishing industry. Follow me on twitter and you’ll find many of these innovators and optimists, I follow them, you might want to as well.

Now the reasons that publishing will survive thrive are tied to these people or those like them.  People that want to turn the tanker of publishing around and are trying to find ways to do it that aren’t just to make a quick buck but that build sustainability and allow for growth year over year which is necessary.  Publishers need to take chances and let those that have the unique views run with ideas and concepts, you never know what might happen.  Too many times, the bean counters are running pub houses; which influences editing, acquiring materials and so on, it shouldn’t be that way, you need people who say I love publishing in all of its facets and let’s shake things up.  Granted that big tanker of publishing is slow-moving, but you have to start somewhere and realize that if you are afraid to try it, then you should try it… because sitting by and doing the same old thing time after time and not having any results, that’s just crazy people, not the good kind of crazy, the other kind. eBooks are one way out, we also have apps now and transmedia, an ever developing model and the list goes on. There are options, we don’t need to say only this way or that way, why not try them all or experiment with them and see what works for your company or project.  Let the innovators do their thing…innovate and come up with ideas, no matter how batty they may sound, ingenuity and creativity more than ever now needs to be at the forefront and publishers, customers and everyone involved needs to have a voice.  All of these items I mention are what will keep publishing going, keep it creating and make it successful.

What are your thoughts though? Digital Book World has asked this many times, where do you see publishing going? What are you afraid of? What excites you? Who excites you in publishing? Find these ideas, concepts, people, companies and talk to them, listen, watch and take away an idea.  Publishing isn’t dead, it’s in a fun house of mirrors trying to find its way out, so why not crack a few mirrors and maybe help show the way. If you don’t agree, tell me what you think are the reasons it will fail if you believe so or what do you see it needs to do to thrive and keep going.

Google Editions

So the web, twitter and it seemed like everyone in publishing and those not in it were talking a lot about Google Editions which is to come by end of year.  Google Editions has some nice features and offers. Offline reading, which should just be standard, accessible from anything with a browser, very smart and hosted in the cloud.  Now this is a very smart move, this helps take away the whole device issue and moves to what I have stated for the past couple years but others as well, that eBooks need to be device agnostic.  No matter what you are using you can get to the eBook from anywhere, google may very well achieve this.  Yet, there is one little hiccup, what about those people who want the actual eBook file, ePub, pdf or other format?  Hosted in the cloud means no file to worry about, but I see some areas where they may want to have access to the file itself.  Supposedly google will allow for an archival version to be downloaded and have to use for personal use, but let’s be real, will the rules be followed. I’ve also seen it may be only the PDF version and may have DRM on it, even if you choose no DRM to be applied. So the question here is what’s the deal, hopefully I’ll know more as I am actually asking them this question because it seems odd if you can have ePub but the archive version might be pdf, kind of defeats the purpose.

Google Editions also mentioned that format only matters in how they accept it and how they use on the backend but not for downloading. It’s weird.. send us ePub, but it won’t matter because you access online, ok… I guess.  By no means am I slamming google, they are trying to approach the problem that is plaguing everyone, device snowstorm, which to choose, which to develop for and how to go about it.  When you think about it, makes sense for google to work with ePub, it’s the defacto standard, people are designing for it, I know I am, so it’s a workflow ability where everything can flow easier.  I look forward to seeing what becomes of google editions but mostly, will it actually launch come the start of 2011?  Who knows, it could change again, maybe it’ll be like Microsoft’s courier and shutdown.  I do know that people want eBooks, they want them the way they want them and they want them as soon as possible. They don’t want to wait, they barely want to pay the prices on them, which are much lower than the current hardcovers, that’s another blog topic.

I see Google Editions doing well, initially it’ll do great, it makes sense, largest search and discoverability engine, whether you like them or not, you need to jump onto it if you are an author or smaller pub and want your eBooks seen.  It’ll be interesting to see how metadata plays out with it and how well it works for libraries? The ed market is watching this closely, they want to see what will their patrons/students be able to do with google editions, how will it affect eBook lending? If the archival version is the only version available to download and Google will be checking IP’s, which is how they will handle authentication apparently, so no passing your username and password to others, they’ll have to look at how they work with the ever-changing ed market. As libraries have stated loudly, the models out there are not ideal, so what will google’s be if any at all?  All we can do now is sit and wait, see what happens and how well the platform, which it still is, is implemented and used and what the naysayers and google fanatics have to say.


%d bloggers like this: